Jake's place

Your awesome Tagline

145 notes

This Eats At Me

siryouarebeingmocked:

sosungalittleclodofclay:

nietzschesghost:

masterprinter:

theidealisticcynic:

I’ve been stewing on this for a couple of days now, and have decided that there is no non-offensive way to say this, so here we go.

Tumblr all rallied together and got (very correctly) offended at ignition point for her “men cannot be raped” ideology. And I was very happy to see this. But this got me thinking.

Go through the rape tag and look at what is being said there. You’ll find stories of people who have been raped, protests as to why rape is bad, and plenty of scary statistics about rape. But most of those are about women. And the few posts that later involve men, or discuss men are called: “distracting”, “going on a tangent” and “detrimental to the conversation”.

If tumblr is such a place that so many believe that men can be raped, if we are so imbedded with the idea that rape is wrong, why is half of the human population being ignored?

I have to wonder, what’s worse? Saying something so ludicrous that everyone objects and starts the conversation, or ignoring it and shunning it like there is no conversation to be had?

Usually because the conversation is ‘what can we do about x problem affecting women’, and someone rushes in like MEN CAN BE RAPED TOO D8< And yes. Yes, we know this, and it’s a problem o.o The patriarchy - which is what’s telling men that they’re so tough how could they possibly be raped what - is a huge problem and it fucking sucks. It needs addressing. That’s what the men’s rights movement (if it were legitimate and not generally used as an excuse to hate women) should be addressing, and it’s what feminism (if not always in it’s occasionally wtfish tumblr form) is trying to stop. 

But it’s not - in that context - what we’re talking about right now, and it’s not helpful to bring it up in a conversation about ‘what can we do about x problem affecting women’. People get fed up of this being used as a derailing tactic, hence the backlash to ‘omg what about teh menz’ - men have spaces to talk about themselves/their issues/their problems everywhere. Right here and now, we’re talking about this problem that affects women. 

Acting like rape is a problem that only affects women is how feminism deals with men being raped…

Gosh, I wonder why people are saying your movement is no longer about equality, if it ever was.

acting like (everything) is a problem that only affects women is how feminism deals with (everything).

Notice how it’s phrased as “men can be raped”, not “men get raped” or “men are raped’. At no point does MasterPrinter address the reality of men being raped, merely the possibility. Bit of a Freudian slip, I think.

I also like how they admit that patriarchy erases male rape victims, then says that men have safe spaces everywhere. The patriarchy doesn’t just say that men can’t be raped, it says that it’s not really rape when it happens to a man or is done by a woman, often on a legal level.

I’ve seen feminists who were actually talking about male rape accuse people of “derailing” when they started presenting uncomfortable facts. Derailing, in these contexts, doesn’t mean “off-topic”, it means “we don’t want to talk about it”.

Of course, MRAs talk about male rape and its erasure all the time.

To quote anonguy11; if your discussion about rape can be derailed by talking about rape, you weren’t talking about rape.

Reblogging because this is a topic very close to home with me.

36 notes

heroinfriday:

OOOHHHH! So close, A+ for effort though.
What this actually should read is:
You can easily judge the character of a PERSON by how THEY treat those who can do nothing for THEM.
It’s not male specific trait to be nice to people and treat people like fucking human beings!
-Liv

heroinfriday:

OOOHHHH! So close, A+ for effort though.

What this actually should read is:

You can easily judge the character of a PERSON by how THEY treat those who can do nothing for THEM.

It’s not male specific trait to be nice to people and treat people like fucking human beings!

-Liv

125 notes

pastellettart:

Here’s this week’s raffle (sorry it took so long to get up, I had technical difficulties)! 2 randomly chosen winners will get a free drawing of a character of their choice drawn in another character’s costume! Yaay!
This is a free raffle. You don’t need to purchase anything, however you do need to follow the rules below to be entered.
RAFFLE RULES&#160;:
You can enter two ways: 
By following my art blog (pastellettart) and reblogging this post  
AND/OR
By +watching me on DeviantArt and adding this raffle picture to your favorites.
 If you have both a Tumblr and DeviantArt and follow those steps, you get entered TWICE! Yay! (which also means your have a chance of winning both prizes! Whoa!)
 If your Tumblr account wins, I’ll contact you through Tumblr. If your DeviantArt account wins, I’ll contact you through Deviantart.
 Do not make multiple accounts to try to win more prizes. If I find that you’ve done this, I’ll remove you from the raffle and blacklist your username(s).
I will be happy to draw anthros, original characters, characters of all gender identities and crossdressing. However, animal characters will be anthro-ized.
Winners will be randomly chosen and announced next Monday, May 27th!

pastellettart:

Here’s this week’s raffle (sorry it took so long to get up, I had technical difficulties)! 2 randomly chosen winners will get a free drawing of a character of their choice drawn in another character’s costume! Yaay!

This is a free raffle. You don’t need to purchase anything, however you do need to follow the rules below to be entered.

RAFFLE RULES :

You can enter two ways: 

  • By following my art blog (pastellettart) and reblogging this post  

AND/OR

  •  If you have both a Tumblr and DeviantArt and follow those steps, you get entered TWICE! Yay! (which also means your have a chance of winning both prizes! Whoa!)
  •  If your Tumblr account wins, I’ll contact you through Tumblr. If your DeviantArt account wins, I’ll contact you through Deviantart.
  •  Do not make multiple accounts to try to win more prizes. If I find that you’ve done this, I’ll remove you from the raffle and blacklist your username(s).
  • I will be happy to draw anthros, original characters, characters of all gender identities and crossdressing. However, animal characters will be anthro-ized.

Winners will be randomly chosen and announced next Monday, May 27th!

22,135 notes

heroinfriday:

haigenhawkins:

all-four-cheekbones:

durnesque-esque:

thehippiejew:

extrafeisty:

jaycubs:


A Glasgow nightclub has installed a two-way mirror which allows male revellers in private booths to spy on unsuspecting women as they visit the toilet! With no notification or signage anywhere in the venue many female club goers have been left feeling embarrassed and used. Although they do briefly show the mirrors in a promo video, the club has been quickly deleting comments and posts on their social media from club goers trying to alert others to the situation. This is pretty much illegal and hugley violates privacy. Thank you The Shimmy Club for giving us a shiny, new, creative and cool take on objectification. article here

i’m never leaving my house again, this world is just too fucked up.

WHAT!?

gross gross gross gross gross

Good morning disgusting. Remember ladies:
 “No space, leave the place” (fingernail test)
A two way mirror must be set INTO the wall, not placed on top of it.
If you rap/knock against the mirror, one installed onto a wall (a normal mirror) will make a dull sound, because there’s something behind it. A two-way will have more reverberation.
Use the flashlight on your phone to shine on the mirror, if it’s a two-way, you’ll be able to see into the other room.
You can also shield your eyes and see in if you lean up against the glass.
The room being viewed will have to be brightly lit (10x brighter than the room looking in), so if you’re in a typical dimly lit club bathroom, you’re ok.

Spread the word, but that advice about detecting two-way mirrors is false.

Yeah but the Scottish aren’t people.

This is not okay! This is downright fucked, actually. Though you can`t see anything indecent, this is a huge invasion of privacy and is unacceptable.
-Liv

heroinfriday:

haigenhawkins:

all-four-cheekbones:

durnesque-esque:

thehippiejew:

extrafeisty:

jaycubs:

A Glasgow nightclub has installed a two-way mirror which allows male revellers in private booths to spy on unsuspecting women as they visit the toilet! With no notification or signage anywhere in the venue many female club goers have been left feeling embarrassed and used. Although they do briefly show the mirrors in a promo video, the club has been quickly deleting comments and posts on their social media from club goers trying to alert others to the situation. This is pretty much illegal and hugley violates privacy. Thank you The Shimmy Club for giving us a shiny, new, creative and cool take on objectification.
article here

i’m never leaving my house again, this world is just too fucked up.

WHAT!?

gross gross gross gross gross

Good morning disgusting.

Remember ladies:

  • “No space, leave the place” (fingernail test)
  • A two way mirror must be set INTO the wall, not placed on top of it.
  • If you rap/knock against the mirror, one installed onto a wall (a normal mirror) will make a dull sound, because there’s something behind it. A two-way will have more reverberation.
  • Use the flashlight on your phone to shine on the mirror, if it’s a two-way, you’ll be able to see into the other room.
  • You can also shield your eyes and see in if you lean up against the glass.
  • The room being viewed will have to be brightly lit (10x brighter than the room looking in), so if you’re in a typical dimly lit club bathroom, you’re ok.

Spread the word, but that advice about detecting two-way mirrors is false.

Yeah but the Scottish aren’t people.

This is not okay! This is downright fucked, actually. Though you can`t see anything indecent, this is a huge invasion of privacy and is unacceptable.

-Liv

79 notes

just-smith:

oratorasaurus:

One of the most blatant examples of shaming male sexuality is when a man’s talking to a woman with the hope of escalating towards sex in the short- or medium-term, we talk about him having “ulterior motives” or “just trying to get into her pants” as if just wanting to have sex with a woman is some shady, unwholesome interest.

Hardly anyone would see a woman who wants to have sex with a guy and talk in the same way about her “just wanting to get in his pants”, as if that were wrong.

When women are looking for sex, let’s be sex-positive and not slut-shame. When men are looking for sex, let’s be careful around those objectifying rapey perverts.

A woman who sleeps with many women, just using them for their bodies, is a misogynist. A woman who sleeps with many men, just using them for their bodies, is a feminist hero and we are misogynists if we criticise her.

75 notes

heroinfriday:

screaming-because-ezio:

fem-catalyst:

More men are homeless than women. Maybe men don’t have it as easy as you’d like to believe.
Maybe he can take refuge in all the female only shelters.

Please stop embarrassing yourself.
You’re not even considering the reason why female only shelters exist.

http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/Dutton_GenderParadigmInDV-Pt1.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_SOfindings.pdf
lifetime Prevalence of Rape, Physical Violence, and/or Stalking Victimization by an Intimate Partner by Sexual Orientation
Prevalence among Women
“Four in 10 lesbian women (43.8%), 6 in 10 bisexual women (61.1%), and 1 in 3 heterosexual women (35.0%) reported experiencing rape, physical violence, and/or stalking within the context of an intimate partner relationship at least once during their lifetime 
This translates to an estimated 714,000 lesbian women, 2 million bisexual women, and 38.3 million heterosexual women in the United States.”
Prevalence among Men
“Approximately 1 in 4 gay men (26.0%), 4 in 10 bisexual men (37.3%), and more than 1 in 4 heterosexual men (29.0%) reported experiencing rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner during their lifetime
This equates to 708,000 gay men, 711,000 bisexual men, and over 30 million heterosexual men in the United States.”
Now unfortunately I can’t find the number of abuse shelters currently operating in the US but up here in Canada it looks a little something like this:
Number of female abuse shelters in Canada currently operating: 593
Number of male abuse shelters in Canada currently operating: 0
The last one just got shut down and it’s founder committed suicide as a result.
MALE PRIVILEGE!
-Morgan

heroinfriday:

screaming-because-ezio:

fem-catalyst:

More men are homeless than women. Maybe men don’t have it as easy as you’d like to believe.

Maybe he can take refuge in all the female only shelters.

Please stop embarrassing yourself.

You’re not even considering the reason why female only shelters exist.

http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/Dutton_GenderParadigmInDV-Pt1.pdf

http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_SOfindings.pdf

lifetime Prevalence of Rape, Physical Violence, and/or Stalking Victimization by an Intimate Partner by Sexual Orientation

Prevalence among Women

“Four in 10 lesbian women (43.8%), 6 in 10 bisexual women (61.1%), and 1 in 3 heterosexual women (35.0%) reported experiencing rape, physical violence, and/or stalking within the context of an intimate partner relationship at least once during their lifetime 

This translates to an estimated 714,000 lesbian women, 2 million bisexual women, and 38.3 million heterosexual women in the United States.”

Prevalence among Men

“Approximately 1 in 4 gay men (26.0%), 4 in 10 bisexual men (37.3%), and more than 1 in 4 heterosexual men (29.0%) reported experiencing rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner during their lifetime

This equates to 708,000 gay men, 711,000 bisexual men, and over 30 million heterosexual men in the United States.”

Now unfortunately I can’t find the number of abuse shelters currently operating in the US but up here in Canada it looks a little something like this:

Number of female abuse shelters in Canada currently operating: 593


Number of male abuse shelters in Canada currently operating: 0

The last one just got shut down and it’s founder committed suicide as a result.

MALE PRIVILEGE!

-Morgan